Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 27, 1940No. Appeal, 210PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

Morris Goldberg appeals from the refusal of a new trial in a trespass action instituted by him to recover for an injury to his left hand, allegedly sustained when it was struck by an automobile operated by Frank Kelly, appellee. Appellant’s statement of claim averred that the accident occurred as he was crossing Arch Street, Philadelphia, from south to north, “at or about its intersection at 7th Street,” but his testimony, as well as that of his two witnesses, shows that he met with his injury as he was crossing Arch Street at a point some hundred and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fornelli v. Penna. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Fearn v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Carnevale v. McCrady-rodgers Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Ravis v. ShehulskieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Danks v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gatens v. VrabelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Shuman v. NolfiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Gajewski v. LightnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Pinto v. Bell Fruit Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Miller v. GaultSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API