Legal Opinion
Siesto v. Lenox Hill Hospital
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 12, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Nicholas A. Clemente, J.
The defendant hospital moves for disclosure of records of the parents of the infant and an order reserving the right for a continued examination of them. Defendants, Drs. Melnick and Grassi, request the same relief in their cross motion. The plaintiffs, in their first cross motion, seek a protective order against the disclosure demanded by defendants. In their second cross motion, plaintiffs seek sanctions against counsel for defendants Drs. Melnick and Grassi for an alleged distortion or invention of the facts in the depiction of the home life of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Milks v. McIverNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Williams v. Roosevelt HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Suria v. ShiffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Sibley v. Hayes 73 Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Bolos v. Staten Island HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Matter of Marino S.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Magee v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997