Legal Opinion

In Interest of Ra

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1996No. Civil 960182PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

R.A. appealed from an order of the district court of Stutsman County requiring that he be hospitalized and treated for mental illness for a period not to exceed 90 days. Because the order is supported by clear and convincing evidence, and because R.A. may not impeach the validity of the order by a collateral attack on the previous order under which he was committed, we affirm.

On March 4, 1994, R.A. made an initial appearance on a charge for aggravated assault for stabbing a worker with a butcher knife at the Grafton Developmental Center. On April 7,1994, a hearing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. BakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Walker v. WeilenmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  3. In Interest of GustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Nygord v. DietzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In Interest of CWNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. City of Jamestown v. NeumillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Bernstein Ranch, LLC v. United States (In Re Bernstein)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1999
  4. State v. KovalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API