Legal Opinion
United States v. Buchanan
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 17, 2000No. 98-1353, 98-1391, 98-1533, 98-1534, 98-1535, 98-1537, 98-1538, 98-1590, 98-1594, 98-1780PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Judgment of the CourtGilman, J.
MOORE, J., concurred in the opinion except as to Part II.C.3 (the drug dog issue). JONES, J. (pp. 315-18), delivered a separate opinion in which he concurred in the above opinion except as to Parts II.C.3 and II.C.5 (the photo issue). MOORE, J., joined in this opinion only as to Part I, making it the opinion of the court as to the drug dog issue.
OPINION
GILMAN, Circuit Judge.
The defendants in this action were convicted of conspiracy to possess and distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. They raise multiple issues in their appeals, including challenges to the jury…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Burt Lancaster v. Stanley Adams, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- United States v. Darwin Jay Copeland Anthony Antoine HartwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Marlando Hardy (98-4500), Henry Green (98-4523), Anthony Rouse (98-4524), and Shuron Moore (98-4529)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- James E. McCurdy v. Montgomery County, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.