Legal Opinion
Knight v. Armstrong
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 9, 1956No. 37138Published
1Opinion of the Court
303 P.2d 421 (1956)
M.K. KNIGHT, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
Pearl ARMSTRONG, Defendant in Error.
No. 37138.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
October 9, 1956.
Rehearing Denied November 13, 1956.
Duffy & Johnson, Ponca City, for plaintiff in error.
Leon C. Phillips & Martin L. Frerichs, Okemah, for defendant in error.
2Per curiam
Pearl Armstrong, defendant in error, as plaintiff brought this action in the District Court of Okfuskee County to quiet title to 40 acres of land. M.K. Knight, plaintiff in error, was one of the defendants and claimed an undivided one-half interest in the property acquired through a sale on…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Oklahoma State Bank of Wapanucka v. BurnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Knight v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Filtsch v. SipeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Smith v. Citizens Nat. Bank in OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.