Legal Opinion

Ehrhardt v. Varn

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 21, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before Earle, J., Colleton, December, 1896. Foreclosure by C. Ehrhardt against Louisa Varn, and C. Ehrhardt & Son. From judgment defendant, Louisa Varn, appeals. cite: Rev. Stat., 1390, 1391; 2? S. C., 114; 30 S. C., 68. cite: Rev. Stat., 1390, 1391; 2 S. C., 254; 2 Bail., 574, 345; 10 S. C., 133; 27 S. C., Ill; 30 S. C., 391, 61; 31 S. C., 282.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage of real estate against Louisa Varn, the mortgagee, and other defendants claiming same interest in the premises. The defendants, Ehrhardt & Son, in their answer, set up and sought foreclosure of a junior mortgage by Louisa Varn to one DeLoach, who had assigned to Ehrhardt & Son. Louisa Varn, answering the complaint and the answer of Ehrhardt & Son, in the nature of a cross-complaint, among other defenses, alleged usury, and claimed forfeiture of all interest, and counter-claim for double the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Earle v. OwingsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  2. Jones v. GodwinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  3. Plyler v. McGeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API