C.A. Hansen Corp. v. Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Tutan, O'Hara, McCoy, Graham & Lane, P.A.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
JORGENSON, Judge.
C.A. Hansen Corporation and C.A. Hansen, Inc. (C.A. Hansen)1 appeal from a final judgment in a malicious prosecution action against the law firm of Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Tutan, O’Hara, McCoy, Graham & Lane, P.A. (Wicker Smith). We affirm.
This case recurs following our determination that Hansen proved a necessary element in a malicious prosecution action by obtaining a bona fide termination of a third party complaint for indemnity and contribution filed by Wicker Smith. C.A. Hansen Corp. v. Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Tutan, O’Hara, McCoy, Graham & Lane P.A., 565 So.2d 812…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Norton v. HinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Harris v. Lewis State BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- City of Pensacola v. OwensSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- CENT. FLA MACH. CO., INC. v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Northwest Florida Home Health Agency v. MerrillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Melford v. Kahane & Assocs.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2019
- Endacott v. International Hospitality, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Theresa Rivernider v. Steven H. Meyer and Stephen H. Meyer, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015