Legal Opinion
Dial X-Automated Equipment v. Caskey
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided May 4, 2005No. 93S02-0401-EX-8PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DICKSON, Justice.
The Indiana Worker’s Compensation Board found that Plaintiff Anthony Cas-key, a machinist employed by .defendant Dial-X Automated Equipment, was entitled to benefits under the Indiana Worker’s Compensation Act. Appealing the decision of the Board, Dial-X alleged various errors regarding the Board’s determinations of compensability and temporary total disability benefits. The Court of Appeals reversed in a memorandum opinion, and we granted transfer. 1
As a result of an alleged injury sustained while working for Dial-X on May 24, 1999, Caskey was initially off work a week and a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- K-Mart Corp. v. MorrisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Rork v. Szabo FoodsIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Neidige v. Cracker BarrelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Wayman v. J & S PETROLEUM, INC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
3Cited by5 opinions
- DePuy, Inc. v. FarmerIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Young v. MarlingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Vandenberg v. Snedegar Construction, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- PS2, LLC v. ChildersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Sandra R. Peters v. Wal-MartIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012