Legal Opinion
Young v. Marling
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 27, 2009No. 93A02-0805-EX-457PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
Robert Young, doing business as Bob Young Logging ("BYL"), appeals from a decision of the full Worker's Compensation Board ("the Board") affirming the single hearing officer's decision that Glen Mar-ling is entitled to reimbursement for certain medical treatments he received after an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment with BYL. Specifically, BYL argues that the Board's decision is erroneous because Marling is not entitled to reimbursement under the Indiana Worker's Compensation Act (the Act) because the treatments were unauthorized and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sims v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Christopher R. Brown, D.D.S., Inc. v. Decatur County Memorial HospitalIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Furno v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Bertoch v. NBD CORP.Indiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Cavazos v. Midwest General Metals Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Washington Township Fire Department v. Beltway Surgery CenterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Rocky River Farms, Inc. v. PorterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Vandenberg v. Snedegar Construction, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- GRADEX, INC. v. ArbuckleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Sandra R. Peters v. Wal-MartIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012