Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Weaver Weaver

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 27, 2003No. 1010582PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petitioners now before us, Robert Weaver and Frances Weaver, sued Robert's former employer Kimberly-Clark Corporation and other defendants for negligently or wantonly installing, maintaining, or repairing a catwalk and its handrail in a pulp and paper mill while Kimberly-Clark owned the mill and employed Robert and, by such negligence or wantonness, causing Robert's injury, which occurred after Robert's employment with Kimberly-Clark had terminated and after Kimberly-Clark's ownership of the mill, the site of the injury, had terminated. Robert was injured in a fall caused by the failure…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Ex Parte State Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Ex Parte Toyota Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  4. SYSTEM DYNAMICS INTERN., INC. v. BoykinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Birmingham News Co. v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Scott Bridge Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Ex Parte McCormickSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. Trott v. Brinks, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Shiv-Ram, Inc. v. McCalebSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API