Legal Opinion
McCauley v. Trans Union, LLC
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 3, 2004No. 02 Civ.4042 VMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Peter McCauley (“McCauley”) moves this Court pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1) for relief from the Court’s Decision and Order dated December 16, 2003 and from the Judgment entered on December 30, 2003 in favor of the defendant Trans Union LLC (“Trans Union”). Rule 60(b)(1) allows a court to relieve a party from a final judgment based on “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1).
To prevail on a motion for reconsideration under Local Civil Rule 6.3, which governs such motions in this District, “the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Utah v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Ambalu v. RosenblattDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
- Lish v. Harper's Magazine FoundationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Maxwell v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mabary v. Hometown Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011