Legal Opinion
Ambalu v. Rosenblatt
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 17, 2000No. 98 CV 7144PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NICKERSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ambalu brings this class action suit against defendants Rosenblatt and JDR Recovery Corp. (“JDR Recovery”) for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1962, et seq. (“Fair Debt Act”), by attempting to collect an outstanding debt using false and deceitful means. Defendant Rosenblatt has moved to compel plaintiff to accept its offer of judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 and has moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1).
I
Plaintiff Ambalu’s amended…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Board of School Comm'rs of Indianapolis v. JacobsSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Claire Rand, Custodian for Brett Rand v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- O'BRIEN v. Ed Donnelly Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Lucero v. Bureau of Collection Recovery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Bowens v. Atlantic Maintenance Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Yates v. Applied Performance Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- MacKenzie v. Kindred Hospitals East, L.L.C.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.