Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Handy

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 17, 2000No. 98-015 & 98-016Published

1DissentJohnson, J.

Today, the majority strikes down as unconstitutional a legislative act that significantly affects public interest, even though none of the parties in either of the consolidated appeals has ever challenged the constitutionality of the statute at any point during the proceedings, including here on appeal. Thus, there is no lower court ruling on the constitutional question raised sua sponte by the majority. Nor is there any briefing on the issue. Nor was the Attorney General ever warned of any potential constitutional infirmity to the statute or given an opportunity to respond to any such *352perceiv…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tonya K., by Her Mother and Next Friend Diane K. v. Board of Education of the City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Hinsdale v. Village of Essex JunctionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. In Re Appeal of MiserocchiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  4. State v. AuclairSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  5. Town of Westford v. KilburnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API