Legal Opinion
State v. Auclair
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 3, 1939PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, C. J.
The information charges that the respondent “did * * * * sell and deliver milk which he then and there produced when he * * * '* was not licensed as required by Section 7, of No. 99 of the Acts of 1937.” The respondent has demurred, the demurrer has been overruled pro forma, and the cause is before us on his exceptions.
The grounds of the demurrer are (1) that the act is in conflict with sections 2, 5 and 6 of chapter 2 of the Constitution of Vermont, in that it attempts to delegate legislative powers to the milk control board, created by the act; (2) that it deprives the respondent of his…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Clymer v. WebsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Kelbro, Inc. v. MyrickSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
- Vincent v. Vermont State Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- Rogers v. WatsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- State v. Ludlow Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.