Legal Opinion

McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Hays

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 10,740PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Hendricks Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, C.

The appellant sued the appellee upon a written contract for the sale of a reaping machine, to recover the purchase-money therein promised. Issues were formed which were tried by the court. A special finding was rendered upon request. The appellant excepted to the conclusion of law, •and filed a motion for a new trial, assigning as causes that the finding was contrary to law, and that it was not sustained by •the evidence. The motion was overruled, and judgment was rendered for the appellee. The conclusion of law and the overruling of the motion for a new trial are assigned as errors.

T…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moore v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. IronsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Marion Manufacturing Co. v. HardingIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Hoover v. SidenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. E. T. Kenney Co. v. RuffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API