Legal Opinion

E. T. Kenney Co. v. Ruff

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1904No. 4,975PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Pulaski Circuit Court; John C. Nye, Judge. Action by Frank ,F. Ruff against The E. T. Kenney Company and another. From a decree for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The appellee sued the appellants for the cancelation of certain promissory notes and a chattel mortgage executed by him to the appellant The E. T. Kenney Company. The demurrer of the appellants to the complaint for want of sufficient facts was overruled.

The complaint showed that the appellee, a fanner, and engaged in raising corn, executed his written order to the appellants for the purchase of a certain machine known as the “Janney Common Sense Corn-Husker,” made for the purpose of husking corn, and cutting and grinding the cornstalks into small particles for feeding live stock. The order…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Marion Manufacturing Co. v. HardingIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Ohio Thresher & Engine Co. v. HenselIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Skeen v. Springfield Engine & Thresher Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Pitt's Sons' Manufacturing Co. v. SpitznogleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anselm v. AnselmIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API