Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Brown v. Hawkins

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1945No. 7206Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBudge, J.

October 7, 1943, appellants agreed with respondent, in writing, to sell and convey to her a good merchantable, fee simple title in and to a certain lot located in Filer Town-site, Twin Falls County. March 2, 1944, appellants offered to convey title to the property by warranty deed. Respondent refused to accept the conveyance or to pay the unpaid balance on the purchase price because the abstract of title disclosed that a certain judgment which had been entered by the district court in an action for the foreclosure of certain laborers’ and materialmen’s liens had not been satisfied and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Custer v. McCutcheonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Robertson v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Dybvig v. WillisIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Evans v. City of American FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Idaho Lumber & Hardware Co. v. DiGiacomoIdaho Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API