Legal Opinion
Citibank, N.A. v. Bearcat Tire, A.G.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 3, 1982No. 82 C 4298PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
In this diversity action Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”) has sued Bearcat Tire, A.G. (“Bearcat”), Jordan Fishman (“Fishman”) and Louis Fishman & Co. (“Company”). Citibank alleges Bearcat defaulted on a promissory note (the “Note”) (Count I), Fishman defaulted on a personal guaranty of the Note- (Count II) and Bearcat transferred borrowed funds to Company in fraud of Bearcat’s creditor Citibank (Count III). This Court’s August 24, 1982 Order (the “Order”) granted Citibank a judgment by confession against Bearcat. Bearcat has moved under…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Martinez v. TrainorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. LinnDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- Citibank, N.A. v. Real Coffee Trading Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Gallagher v. Kleinwort Benson Government Securities, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- YL Chicago Fund, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020