Legal Opinion

People v. Walker

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 2001No. D035890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, J.

This case requires us to determine whether a trial judge may find an alleged prior conviction “not true” based on the trial judge’s personal belief the prosecution should have to prove the validity of the waiver of Boykin-Tahl 1 rights, even in the absence of a challenge on that ground by the defendant. After rehearing, 2 we conclude the prosecution is not required to prove, as an element of the “truth of a prior conviction” the validity of the underlying change of plea, because such challenge can only be made pursuant to the procedures set forth in People v. Sumstine (1984)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Monge v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. People v. SumstineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. People v. McClaurinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. People v. SamplesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. People v. DaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API