Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. McClaurin

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 2006No. D046052PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCONNELL, P. J.

The People appeal, contending the court erred in

ordering specific performance of a plea bargain for two defendants based on a finding they had detrimentally relied on the plea bargain when they waived time for the preliminary hearing. We reverse the judgment with instructions.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On April 8, 2004, 1 defendants Robert Thornton, Jonathan McClaurin, and a third defendant, were arraigned for committing a battery on a nonconfined person by a prisoner (Pen. Code, 2 § 4501.5), with an enhancement for committing the offense while confined in a state…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. ValentiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. People v. SidenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
  2. People v. CantuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. People v. TrejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. People v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API