Legal Opinion

Standard Sand & Gravel Co. v. McClay

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 1926PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

Three questions are presented for determination: (1) Was there sufficient evidence to establish a contract of sale and delivery of materials? (2) Was tbe defendant relieved of liability by reason of rejection of said material by tbe resident engineer of tbe State Highway Commission? (3) Is tbe defendant Casualty Company liable under its bond for said materials, it being admitted that they were not actually incorporated in the work?

In reference to the first question presented, it is established law that in order to constitute a binding contract the offer and acceptance must be in identical…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Thomas Trammell & Co. v. MountTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Insurance Co. v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. StockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  4. Aderholt v. . CondonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. N. & W. Overall Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brown v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Dodds v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Richardson v. Greensboro Warehouse & Storage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Ingalls Iron Works Co. v. Standard Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. John L. Roper Lumber Co. v. LawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API