Legal Opinion · Dissent

Zurich American Insurance v. Tolbert

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 12, 2010No. 26798Published

1DissentChief Justice Toal

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion and would reverse the court of appeals’ decision finding Tony Tolbert and Tonesha Tolbert’s (Respondents) affidavit creates a genuine issue of material fact sufficient to survive Zurich American Insurance Company’s (Petitioner) motion for summary judgment.

Tony Tolbert (Tolbert), a BMW employee, leased a 2003 BMW 325(BMW) as part of a lease program for BMW employees. Petitioner issued a business automobile insurance policy (Policy) to BMW which provided underinsured (UIM) coverage to the leasing employees in certain circumstances.

On a Saturday…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Iowa Mutual Insurance Company v. AddySupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  2. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Zurich American Insurance v. TolbertCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API