Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. Douglas

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 5, 1979No. 20974PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

This declaratory judgment action was commenced by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company to determine whether a policy extended coverage to an insured while operating a stolen vehicle. The trial judge, sitting without a jury, concluded the insured was afforded coverage under the terms of her policy. We disagree and reverse.

Appellant Nationwide issued a policy to Janet Edmonds on her 1965 Oldsmobile. On March 31, 1976, Ms. Edmonds received a 1969 Pontiac as a gift from her husband. Although her husband purchased the car with knowledge it was “hot,” there is no evidence that Janet…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Erickson v. GenisotMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Bankers Ins. Co. of Pa. v. GriffinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  4. Robinson v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  5. Central National Insurance Co. of Omaha v. SisnerosDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1959

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. Zurich American Insurance v. TolbertCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Zurich American Insurance v. TolbertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API