Legal Opinion

Artman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1987No. Appeal, No. 1014 C.D. 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Narick,

Joanne Artman (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which affirmed a referee’s denial of her claim for benefits. The Board, which did not reach the merits of the case, determined that Claimant’s claim was untimely filed, pursuant to Section 315 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 PS. §602. We affirm.

*343The Claimant raises two issues in her appeal: whether the payment of medical expenses operates to toll the three-year statute of limitations set forth in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Paolis v. Tower Hill Connellsville Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Glinka v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. NiemannCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Dennis v. E. J. Lavino & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. CRL of Maryland, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Levine v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Meltzer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Artman v. WCAB (ST. PAUL'S HOME)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API