Legal Opinion

Glinka v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 1983No. Appeals, Nos. 1055 C.D. 1981 and 1309 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Williams, Jr.,

William Glinka (claimant) and Sears, Roebuck and Company (Sears or employer) both appeal from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed as modified a referee’s order from which claimant, and not employer, appealed.

On September 30, 1972, while employed by Sears as a debt collector, claimant suffered lower back injuries in an automobile accident. By agreement, claimant received compensation at a rate of $80.00 per week until he returned to work on November 27, 1972, and executed a final receipt which terminated benefits. Upon the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Latella v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Cleland Simpson Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board of the Commonwealth v. LeuschenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Lord v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Shank v. Consolidation Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Berwick Industries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Glinka V.Workmens Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. O'Brien v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Kerns v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. P.R. Hoffman Materials v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API