McKeige v. Carroll
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Ferdinand McKeige, from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Brooklyn, in favor of the defendant, rendered on the 26tli day of November, 1906, dismissing the complaint upon the merits.
1Opinion of the Court
Rich, J.:
This action was brought to recover a balance alleged to be due and unpaid upon a contract for laying an asbestos-granite floor and the bottoms of two window seats in defendant’s place of'business. The plaintiff is a manufacturer and layer of what is known as “ Asbestos-Granite ” floors, which are composed of calcined magnesite mixed with chloride of magnesia by a secret process, forming a cement which sets after being laid, and becomes waterproof. One John F. Robert Troeger was engaged in the business of deco*522rating and- frescoing mosaic floors, etc.- He was not in the employ of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Eighmie v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Smith v. . TracyNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
- Hooper v. . StoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Clough v. WhitcombMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Angerosa v. White Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Hampton Cotton Mills v. HershfeldNew York Supreme Court · 1923
- Myers v. SteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913