Legal Opinion

Hard v. American Trust & Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 17, 1917No. 6 Div. 487PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Chancery Court, Jefferson County; A. H. Benners, Chancellor. Bill by the American Trust & Savings Bank against James H. 1-Iard. and others. Prom adverse rulings on their demurrers to the bill, respondents appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLELLAN, J.

The appeal is by respondents from adverse rulings on their demurrers to the bill, original and as amended. The consideration here is necessarily confined to the matter presented by the appeal., This bill is filed by -the appellee as a simple contract creditor of the appellants James H. 1-Iard and Annie G. Hard, his wife. Along with these two respondents Herbert G. Hard, their son, is brought in as a party respondent: So on the theory that the son is the grantee in a conveyance by his parents, that is voidable at appellee’s election,, because infractive of the appellee’s rights as creditor of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kingsbury v. FlowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. Truss v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. Ellis v. VandergriftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Smith v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Scott v. TaulSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hackney v. YarbroughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Lambert v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Rountree v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Sansom v. SturkieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. Burnwell Coal Co. v. SetzerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API