Legal Opinion
Boland v. Wasco, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 13, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-0739PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Re Document No.: 7
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GraNting Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiffs in this action are James Boland and several other Trustees (“Trustees”) of the Bricklayers & Trowel Trades International Pension Fund (“IPF”). The IPF is an employee benefit plan and a multiemployer plan as defined under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). See Compl. ¶¶ 1, 3, ECF No. 1. Defendants Wasco Inc. and Lovell’s Masonry (hereinafter collectively referred to as “WASCO”) are building and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Warren v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Presidential Bank, Fsb v. 1733 27th Street Se LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Morales v. Fine Design Masonry, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2024