Legal Opinion

State v. Rowe

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 20, 1890PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal as upon Writ oe Error, from the Criminal Court of Baltimore. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtIrving, J.

By ordinance No. 17, of the year 1889, the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, set apart a certain portion of “Centre Market,” particularly described in the ordinance, for a “wholesale market for the sale of fresh and *549frozen fish and crabs.” This was provided for in the first section of the ordinance. By the second section of the ordinance it was provided, “that no person shall be permitted to use said market for the sale of fresh and frozen fish and crabs as aforesaid without first obtaining a license therefor from the clerk of said market. ” The third section forbade the sale of fresh and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. Mary's Industrial School for Boys v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
  2. Vansant v. Harlem Stage Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1883

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jones v. GordyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  2. Commissioners of Easton v. CoveyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  3. State v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  4. State v. ApplegarthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  5. Mayor of Baltimore v. Canton Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API