Legal Opinion

State v. Applegarth

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 16, 1895PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal and writ of error from the Criminal Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, J.

The appellees were indicted for engaging in the business of packing and canning, for sale and transportation, oysters taken in the waters of this State, without obtaining from the State a license therefor. A demurrer to the indictment *297was interposed, which was sustained, pro forma, by the Court below. The prosecution is based on sections 66 and 67, Article 72 of the Code of Public - General Laws, as amended by chapter 380 of the laws of 1894. It is contended on behalf of the appellees that these sections are: (1), in, conflict with the Constitution of this State, because the license provided…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCready v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Bradshaw v. LankfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  3. State v. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
  4. State v. Cumberland & Pennsylvania RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  5. Vansant v. Harlem Stage Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Nunnemacher v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Maryland Theatrical Corp. v. BrennanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  3. Lovejoy v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Holiday Point Marina Partners v. Anne Arundel CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Ruggles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API