Legal Opinion
State v. Dreps
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 11, 1996No. NonePublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
[¶ 1] Joseph W. Dreps (Dreps) appeals his conviction of possession of a controlled substance and possession of marijuana. He *340claims evidence obtained in a consent search of his car and statements he made while seated in a patrol car which were tape recorded without his knowledge should have been suppressed. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2] Dreps was stopped by highway patrol troopers Steve Swenson and Brian Bard on May 1, 1994. The troopers noticed a dangling object hanging from the rear view mirror of Dreps’ vehicle and heard an exhaust leak, which prompted them to stop the vehicle.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. ZachodniSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. AlmondSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. BuchholzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. AkubaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. MoratoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. MeyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.