Fortson v. Iden
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWickens, J.
This action was commencd by a father to recover from a husband for the cost of the burial of the daughter of plaintiff and wife of defendant.
After a trial before the judge, a judgment for the defendant was entered. Appellee-defendant-husband has filed no brief and did not participate in the argument before this court.
Since this is not a matter of great public interest the failure to file a brief by appellee may be taken as a confession of error. Public Utilities Co. v. McDonald (1919), 69 Ind. App. 403, 404, 122 N. E. 11; Ralston v. Ryan (1940), 217 Ind. 482, 483, 29 N. E. 2d 202.
If a prima…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McElwaine-Richards Co. v. WallIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Ralston v. RyanIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
- Scott v. CarothersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- Muscatatuck State School v. DerringerIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
- Rocap v. BlackwellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Adoption of SheeksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976