Legal Opinion

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wallace

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 2, 1893No. 213PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.

The holding of the county judge, that because the road of appellant was not fenced at the point where the animal was killed, it was liable without proof of negligence in such killing, was erroneous.

The evidence showed, that at that place appellant had established a flag station and siding where passengers were taken on and put off, and where freight was received and delivered by it, and where switching of trains was necessary for these purposes. It also appeared that across its main line and switch appellant kept up a crossing for a road, which had been in use…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. I. & G. N. R. R. Co. v. CockeTexas Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gulp, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. BlankenbecklerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. BuiceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Abbott v. Beaumont, S. L. & W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. BuiceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Gulf, O. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. CoffmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API