Legal Opinion

McKown v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 29, 1936No. Appeal, 35PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The action below was assumpsit to recover certain disability benefits alleged to be due under a life insurance policy issued to the plaintiff by the defendant company, and for the return of certain premiums paid under protest by plaintiff to defendant, the payment of which plaintiff alleged defendant had waived. A verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $2,340.65; defendant’s motions for judgment n. o. v. or a new trial were denied; and it has appealed from the judgment entered upon the verdict.

The following facts were not controverted: On June…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Cooper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Guise v. New York Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Osche v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cherry v. MitoskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Guise v. New York Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Myers v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Knepp v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Lancaster Transportation Co. v. New York & New Brunswick Auto Express Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API