Legal Opinion

Okun v. Stuart House Condominium Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 26, 1978No. 77-1484PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Affirmed. The record on appeal in the instant case does not contain a transcript of either the trial below or the evidentiary hearing on attorneys’ fees. Because the final judgment in foreclosure appealed relates directly to these matters, we do not have before us an adequate record upon which to review the actions of the trial court. Accordingly, we must assume that the judgment appealed is correct; therefore, we affirm. See, e. g., Williamson v. Williamson, 335 So.2d 346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Strickland v. Lewis, 328 So.2d 244 (Fla.1st DCA 1976); Dade County Board of Public Instruction v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dade County Board of Public Instruction v. FosterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Butler v. Metropolitan Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. Williamson v. WilliamsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Strickland v. LewisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Garcia v. Alexis Nihon Properties Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Holland International, Inc. v. PollackDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Valdes v. NatemanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API