Dade County Board of Public Instruction v. Foster
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
In the final judgment appealed herein, the trial judge concluded that the appellee was an omnibus insured under an insurance policy issued to the Dade County Board of Public Instruction. Said judgment recites that this determination was made after “evidence having been taken in the cause”.
The policy was ambiguous. The trial judge indicated he received evidence, yet no such evidence was presented in the record on appeal. We therefore affirm.
It is incumbent for the appellant, under Florida Appellate Rules, to bring the record to the court sufficient to demonstrate error. See: Rules 3.6, subds.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pierson v. SharpDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Phillips v. BlumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Stuco Corp. v. GatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Belflower v. RisherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ahmed v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Zarate v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Hazuri v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- In re Guardianship of CoolidgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Okun v. Stuart House Condominium Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.