Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel A. Kosth
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 18, 2001No. 00-1215PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.
Daniel Kosth was convicted on four counts of making false statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 in connection with loans from the Small Business Administration (SBA). His appeal rests principally on a claim that the evidence was insufficient to support those convictions, although he also raises a few other arguments and he claims error in the trial court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines. We find that the evidence was adequate to support the jury’s conclusions and that no other reversible error occurred, and we therefore affirm the convictions.
I
The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Thomas S. Ross and John ColloriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. James P. HickokCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Jesse T. GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Seymour Sacks Star Sacks v. Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service, Michael R. Geyser Joyce Geyser v. Commissioner, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. James C. HendricksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. VallarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Robert B. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Antonio AlanisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Roman SkoczenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.