Legal Opinion

Haraden v. State

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 17, 2011PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.

[¶ 1] David R. Haraden seeks review of an order of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Crowley, J.) finding him incompetent to proceed with a portion of his petition for post-conviction review of his 2006 conviction for murder, 17-A M.R.S. § 201(1)(A), (B) (2010). We granted Hara-den a certificate of probable cause naming four issues for consideration: whether (1) the appeal is interlocutory; (2) competency may be determined in post-conviction proceedings; (3) there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the court’s finding that Haraden is incompetent; and (4) the court erred in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. HaagSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Colleen Mary Rohan, Ex Rel. Oscar Gates v. Jeanne Woodford, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jed R. Middleton v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  2. State of Maine v. Michael G. NickersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  3. State of Maine v. Travis R. GerrierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  4. A.I. v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  5. A.I. v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API