De Rees v. Costaguta
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The ease is stated in the opinion. The District Court had general jurisdiction of the parties.' All the requisite elements existed to give the court jurisdiction of the subject-matter under § 57, Jud. Code. Goodman v. Niblack, 102 U. S. 556; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 234 U. S. 369; Chesley v. Morton, 9 App.
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The ease is stated in the opinion. The District Court had general jurisdiction of the parties.' All the requisite elements existed to give the court jurisdiction of the subject-matter under § 57, Jud. Code. Goodman v. Niblack, 102 U. S. 556; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 234 U. S. 369; Chesley v. Morton, 9 App. Div. 461. Distinguishing: York County Savings Bank v. Abbot, 139 Fed. Rep. 988; Jones v. Gould, 149 Fed. Rep. 153; Wabash R. R. Co. v. West Side Belt R. R. Co.,…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day
The appellant, plaintiff below, a resident and citizen of the State of New Jersey, filed a bill.of complaint against David Costaguta, Marcos A. Algiers, Alejandro Sassoeli, Eugenio Ottolenghi, individually, and as co-partners composing the firm of David Costaguta & Company, asserting that they, and . each of them, were aliens, and residents of the Republic of Argentine, South America. The bill joined as defendants Renado Taffell, a British subject, resident of New York and the Southern District thereof, and the American-European Trading Corporation, organized under the laws of New York.
The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- G. & C. Merriam Co. v. SaalfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Illinois Central Railroad Company, Appt. v. Wirt AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Shepard v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Louisville Trust Co. v. KnottSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Smith v. McKaySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smith v. AppleSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Williams v. Steamship Mutual Underwriting Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Oliver American Trading Co. v. Government of United States of MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Oliver American Trading Co. v. Government of United States of MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- De Rees v. CostagutaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.