Legal Opinion

Scanlan v. Cowley

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided August 15, 1859PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

The defendant is a manufacturing jeweller, and in the fore part of August, 1855, employed the plaintiff as journeyman, to work for him at the wages of $5 per week. While thus employed the plaintiff offered to procure for the defendant the jobbing work of a Mr. James Turner, who did business in the 8th Avenue, in this city; and the defendant agreed that if this work was procured he would give the plaintiff $6 per week wages. This arrangement was consummated, and the plaintiff was in the habit of calling at Turner’s shop, on his way down to the defendant’s place of business, getting the work to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holley v. MixNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  2. Foshay v. FergusonNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Baldwin v. WeedNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  4. Seibert v. PriceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vinal v. CoreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Thompson v. LumleyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1875
  3. Shafer v. LoucksNew York Supreme Court · 1870
  4. King v. ColvinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1877
  5. Crumeill v. HillCity of New York Municipal Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API