Legal Opinion

Crumeill v. Hill

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 15, 1886Published

Motion for new trial upon the minutes. .

1Opinion of the Court

McAdam, Ch. J.

On January 7,1884, there was stolen from the possession of the defendant, a tub of butter worth fourteen dollars. It was stolen in the night time, and suspicion of guilt pointed to two boys, viz.: Edward Edgar and Albert Orumeill, the plaintiff.

The boys were sent for, and came to the plaintiff’s store: Edgar admitted his guilt, and said that Orumeill had stolen the tub and carried it down to a stable and had there given it to him (Edgar). On this, the boys were requested to go to the station-house and they accompanied the defendant hither. ■ .

Upon the arrival of -the parties at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burns v. . ErbenNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Wood v. City of BrooklynNew York Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Brown v. ChadseyNew York Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Thorne v. . TurckNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Phillips v. TrullNew York Supreme Court · 1814

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API