Legal Opinion

International Seaway Trading Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 12, 1972No. C.D. 4375PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

This case presents the question as to the proper tariff classification of footwear imported from Hong Kong that was described on the invoice as “Basketball High Shoes”. The imported footwear was classified under item 700.60 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States as “[fjootwear (whether or not described elsewhere in this subpart) which is over 50 percent by weight of rubber or plastics * * *” and assessed with duty at the rate of 20 percent ad valorem.

Plaintiff claims that this classification is erroneous and contends that the footwear is properly dutiable at 15 percent ad…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. International Seaway Trading Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. International Seaway Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API