Legal Opinion

International Seaway Trading Corp. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 20, 1973No. 5523, C.A.D. 1112PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision arid judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Division, 69 Cust. Ct. 38, 349 F. Supp. 1019, C.D. 4375 (1972) overruling appellant’s protest against the classification of footwear invoiced as “Basketball High Shoes” under item 700.60 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States [TSUS] as “ [f]ootwear (whether or not described elsewhere in this subpart) which is over 50 percent by weight of rubber * * *: Other” and assessed at 20% ad valorem. Appellant claims the merchandise, should be classified under item 700.70, TSUS, as “[f]ootwear * *…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. International Seaway Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  2. Kreiss Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. V.G. Nahrgang Co., F/a Anthony Paglialungo v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Standard Surplus Sales, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  3. Ferriswheel v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  4. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  5. United States v. Standard Surplus SalesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API