Futch v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
625 So.2d 1019 (1993)
Thomas FUTCH
v.
COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE CO., et al.
No. 93-C-0493.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
October 28, 1993.
Order Clarifying Decision on Limited Grant of Rehearing January 6, 1994.
Christopher T. Grace, Jr., Metairie, for applicant.
Quentin F. Urquhart, Jr., Robert J. Young, Jr., New Orleans, for respondent.
WATSON, Justice.[1]
Plaintiff, Dr. Thomas J. Futch, II, suffered devastating personal injuries as a consequence of a December, 1984, automobile accident. Futch claimed underinsured (UM) damages from Commercial Union Insurance Company, the excess/umbrella insurer of his…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Hall; Concurrence · Hall; Concurrence · Ortique; Concurrence · Lemmon; Per curiam.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pareti v. Sentry Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
- Tugwell v. State Farm Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Roger v. Estate of MoultonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- State v. BarrasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Thibodeaux v. BurtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- AMERICAN RESOURCES INS. v. H & H Stephens Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Moyles v. CruzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Savant v. American Cent. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Deville v. Allstate Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Hayes v. De BartonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.