Brockway v. Brockway
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
Keith B. Brockway (husband) appeals the district court’s order on husband’s declaratory judgment action to determine the meaning of the divorce decree provision “[wife] shall receive one-half (½) of [husband’s] Air Force retirement.” The district court ruled the phrase was not ambiguous and meant that Mary M. Brockway (wife) was entitled to one-half of husband’s full retirement, inelud-ing that portion attributable to his post-divorce Air Force service and that portion attributable to his Air Force service before the marriage. We affirm.
ISSUES
Appellant Keith B. Broekway states…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Grosskopf v. GrosskopfWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Broadhead v. BroadheadWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Smith v. Nugget Exploration, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Mountain View/Evergreen Improvement & Service District v. Casper Concrete Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Scherer Construction, LLC v. Hedquist Construction, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Mathis v. WendlingWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Royal v. First Interstate Bank of Commerce (In Re Straight)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Fayard v. Design Committee of Homestead SubdivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Glover v. CraykWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.