Legal Opinion

Fayard v. Design Committee of Homestead Subdivision

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 2010No. S-09-0145PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Cynthia Fayard and Galeforce, LLC 1 (collectively “Fayard”) own lots in the Homestead Subdivision in Teton County. Fayard filed a declaratory judgment and in- junetive action against the Design Committee of the Homestead Subdivision, 2nd and 3rd Filings, and committee members Sandra Day, Horton Spitzer and Gary Finkel (collectively “the Design Committee”), alleging the Design Committee had improperly approved a special assessment to pave the common roads. The district court ruled that the Design Committee had acted within its authority under the subdivision covenants and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Cook v. Shoshone First BankWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Amoco Production Co. v. EM Nominee Partnership Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Hatton v. Energy Electric Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Goglio v. Star Valley Ranch Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Magin v. Solitude Homeowner's Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Reichert v. DaughertyWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Ultra Resources, Inc., a Wyoming CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Rafter J Ranch Homeowner's Association, a Wyoming Nonprofit Corporation v. Stage Stop, Inc., a Wyoming Profit CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2024
  5. North Fork Land & Cattle, Lllp v. First American Title Insurance CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API