Legal Opinion

Miller v. Tanners' Supply Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1907No. Docket No. 61PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Assumpsit by Henry B. Miller and Harry E. Miller, copartners as H. B. Miller & Son, against the Tanners’ Supply Company, Limited, for breach of a contract for the sale of certain wood. There was judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

This suit was tried in the circuit court without a jury, a finding of facts made, and judgment rendered for the plaintiffs. We quote from said finding of facts:

*294“First. November 18,1903, Harry E. Miller and Richard B. Yos composed the firm of Miller & Yos, with whom Henry B. Miller was associated as a silent partner. Later [January 2, 1904] Henry B. Miller purchased the interest of Yos in the business, and the firm was thereafter styled H. B. Miller & Son.
“Second. On the date mentioned, the defendant and Miller & Yos were and had been engaged in the business of buying and selling wood for and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Quinnin v. ReimersMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Yellowstone Sheep Co. v. Diamond Dot Live Stock Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Johnson v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Jordan v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Battin v. Merchants State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API