Miller v. Tanners' Supply Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Assumpsit by Henry B. Miller and Harry E. Miller, copartners as H. B. Miller & Son, against the Tanners’ Supply Company, Limited, for breach of a contract for the sale of certain wood. There was judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
This suit was tried in the circuit court without a jury, a finding of facts made, and judgment rendered for the plaintiffs. We quote from said finding of facts:
*294“First. November 18,1903, Harry E. Miller and Richard B. Yos composed the firm of Miller & Yos, with whom Henry B. Miller was associated as a silent partner. Later [January 2, 1904] Henry B. Miller purchased the interest of Yos in the business, and the firm was thereafter styled H. B. Miller & Son.
“Second. On the date mentioned, the defendant and Miller & Yos were and had been engaged in the business of buying and selling wood for and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Quinnin v. ReimersMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by6 opinions
- Williams v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Yellowstone Sheep Co. v. Diamond Dot Live Stock Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1931
- Johnson v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Jordan v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Battin v. Merchants State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.