Legal Opinion

Rivas v. Napolitano

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 25, 2012No. 09-56843PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order; Opinion by Judge PREGERSON; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BEA.

ORDER

The opinion for Rivas v. Napolitano, 677 F.3d 849 (9th Cir.2012), filed on April 25, *11102012, is amended as follows at page 851, column A, lines 7-9:

Remove <the government denies a visa without a “facially legitimate and bona fide reason.” >

Insert in its place <“a U.S. citizen’s constitutional rights are alleged to have been violated by the denial of a visa to a foreigner” without a “facially legitimate and bona fide reason” for the denial. >

OPINION

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

Hilario Alfonso Rivas…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Siderman de Blake v. Republic of ArgentinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Patel v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. Roberts v. CorrothersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Victoria Rosales Jesus Rosales Rebecca Rosales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Jerrid Allen v. Kevin MilasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Emami v. NielsenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  3. Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans v. Kristin K. MayesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  4. Candor v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
  5. Jane Doe 1 v. NielsenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API