Legal Opinion

Kuppenbender v. Riszdorfer

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 26, 1939No. 4167PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacksoN, Judge

This is an appeal in an interference proceeding from a decision of the Board of Appeals which affirmed the decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention to appellee, the senior party.

The interference is between patent No. 2,031,321 of appellant, dated February 18, 1936, on an application serial No. 753,080, filed November 15, 1934, and an application of appellee for reissue of his patent No. 2,000,037, dated May 7, 1935, on application serial No. 511,832, filed January 28, 1931.

The invention relates to means in a photographic camera for automatically determining the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fontijn v. OkamotoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  2. Walter H. Wirkler v. Corles M. Perkins and Alfred BennettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  3. Harold S. Hemstreet v. William S. RohlandCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  4. Andrew Corp. v. Gabriel Electronics, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API