Legal Opinion
State v. Carver
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 1972No. 71-772PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStern, J.
Defendant raises herein ten propositions of law, which we deal with in the order presented.
I
Defendant contends that the trial court erred in admitting the shorthand notes of the oral statement given by defendant on the morning of September 5, 1969. He argues that defendant had been held incommunicado; that his statement was not voluntarily given; and that his Miranda rights were not knowingly and intelligently waived.
The facts surrounding the taking of this statement reveal that defendant, then 18 years of age, had been in police custody from about 1:30 a. m. to 5:30 a. m. He was advised that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Gallegos v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- State v. NoltonOhio Supreme Court · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. HallerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. MoritzOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. BlevinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. BowdenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.